OpenStreetMap

Users' Diaries

Recent diary entries

Posted by Cyberjuan on 9 April 2024 in Spanish (Español). Last updated on 10 April 2024.

 Tal como anunciamos en anterior post, seguimos informando a la comunidad OpenStreetMap LATAM sobre los comités del SOTM LATAM 2024, ahora les presentamos al Comité de Programación.

Este comité tiene como principales funciones:

  • Proponer la programación de actividades durante los días del SOTM
  • Diseñar las Actividades protocolares
  • Diseñar los Tracks del evento
  • Diseñar las Actividades paralelas
  • Diseñar las Actividades de recreación
  • Coordinar con los ponentes lo necesario para sus participaciones
  • Evaluar la realización de reconocimientos a los mapeadores de la región

Los miembros del comité son:

Miembro Representación Cargo Rol
Anderson Toniazo OSM Brasil Miembro Comité de Organización
Virginia Brussa OSM Argentina Miembro  
Olga Paredes OSM Bolivia Miembro  
Yasmila Herrera Yeka Street Miembro  
Sebastián Bravo Youthmappers SAGEMA Miembro  
Mariela Centeno Youthmappers ESPE Miembro  
Juan A. Barajas Youthmappers LATAM Miembro Comité de Organización

Este comité debe tener su primera reunión en los próximos días para elegir a su presidente y empezar a cumplir sus funciones.

Si usted cree que puede aportar a este comité favor de comunicarse al correo state arroba osmlatam punto org.

Location: El Porvenir, La Oroya, Yauli, Junín, Perú
Posted by Cyberjuan on 9 April 2024 in English. Last updated on 10 April 2024.

 As we announced in the previous post, we continue to inform the OpenStreetMap LATAM community about the SOTM LATAM 2024 committees, and now we present the Academic Program Committee.

The main functions of this committee are:

  • Evaluate the presentation proposals received
  • Evaluate scholarship applications received
  • Management of travel and accommodation scholarships

As additional information for those interested in presenting a talk or presentation, the topics may be (but are not limited to):

  • Mapping projects developed or under development in the region.
  • Projects to improve the labeling system in the region.
  • Projects to improve the use of notes in the region.
  • Extrinsic or intrinsic quality assessment of OpenStreetMap data
  • Analysis of contribution patterns in OpenStreetMap
  • Generation of new and scientifically valuable datasets from OpenStreetMap
  • Assessments of data import procedures and their impacts on data and community
  • Integration between OpenStreetMap and other data sources (authoritative, user-generated, or otherwise valuable to OpenStreetMap)
  • Analysis/comparison of available software for scientific purposes related to OpenStreetMap
  • Novel approaches to facilitate or improve data collection and/or data quality in OpenStreetMap (e.g. through gamification or citizen science approaches)
  • Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning from, and with OpenStreetMap (e.g. AI-assisted mapping)
  • Open research problems in OpenStreetMap and challenges for the scientific community
  • Cultural, political, and organizational aspects of data production and usage practices in OpenStreetMap
  • Studies using OpenStreetMap data in scientific domains
  • Reviews of any scientific aspect connected to OpenStreetMap

The committee members are:

Member Representation Position Role
Rodrigo Smarzaro UMBRAOSM Member Organizing committee
Matheus Correia COIMBRA Univ. Member  
Nathan Damas Youthmappers UFPR Member  
Kauê de Moraes V. Youthmappers UFPR Member  
Maya Lovo Youthmappers Member  
Carolina Garcia Youthmappers ESPE Member  
Patricia Llanos SBCS Member  
Sandra Hernandez Youthmappers Uaemex Member  

This committee should have its first meeting in the coming days to elect its president and begin carrying out its duties.

Location: Huanchaquito, Huanchaco, Province of Trujillo, La Libertad, 13000, Peru
Posted by Cyberjuan on 9 April 2024 in Spanish (Español). Last updated on 10 April 2024.

 Tal como anunciamos en el anterior post, seguimos informando a la comunidad OpenStreetMap LATAM sobre los comités del SOTM LATAM 2024, ahora les presentamos al Comité de Programa Académico.

Este comité tiene como principales funciones:

  • Evaluar las propuestas de ponencias recibidas
  • Evaluar las solicitudes de becas recibidas
  • Gestión de becas de viajes y alojamiento.

Como información adicional para quienes estén interesados en presentar una charla o ponencia, los temas de estas pueden ser (pero no están limitadas a):

  • Proyectos de mapeo desarrollados o en desarrollo en la región.
  • Proyectos para mejorar el sistema de etiquetado en la región.
  • Proyectos para mejorar el uso de las notas en la región.
  • Evaluación de la calidad de los datos de OpenStreetMap
  • Análisis de patrones de contribución en OpenStreetMap
  • Generación de conjuntos de datos nuevos y científicamente valiosos a partir de OpenStreetMap
  • Evaluaciones de los procedimientos de importación de datos y sus impactos en los datos y la comunidad.
  • Integración entre OpenStreetMap y otras fuentes de datos (autorizadas, generadas por el usuario o de otro modo valiosas para OpenStreetMap)
  • Análisis/comparación de software disponible con fines científicos relacionados con OpenStreetMap
  • Enfoques novedosos para facilitar o mejorar la recopilación de datos y/o la calidad de los datos en OpenStreetMap (por ejemplo, a través de enfoques de gamificación o ciencia ciudadana)
  • Inteligencia artificial/aprendizaje automático a partir de y con OpenStreetMap (por ejemplo, mapeo asistido por IA)
  • Problemas abiertos de investigación en OpenStreetMap y desafíos para la comunidad científica
  • Aspectos culturales, políticos y organizativos de las prácticas de producción y uso de datos en OpenStreetMap
  • Estudios que utilizan datos de OpenStreetMap en dominios científicos
  • Reseñas de cualquier aspecto científico relacionado con OpenStreetMap.

Los miembros del comité son:

Miembro Representación Cargo Rol
Rodrigo Smarzaro UMBRAOSM Miembro Organizing committee
Matheus Correia Univ. COIMBRA Miembro  
Nathan Damas Youthmappers UFPR Miembro  
Kauê de Moraes V. Youthmappers UFPR Miembro  
Maya Lovo Youthmappers Miembro  
Carolina Garcia Youthmappers ESPE Miembro  
Patricia Llanos SBCS Miembro  
Sandra Hernandez Youthmappers Uaemex Miembro  

Este comité debe tener su primera reunión en los próximos días para elegir a su presidente y empezar a cumplir sus funciones.

Si usted cree que puede aportar a este comité favor de comunicarse al correo state arroba osmlatam punto org.

Location: Huanchaquito, Huanchaco, Trujillo, La Libertad, 13000, Perú

Welcome to my fourth OpenStreetMap NextGen development diary.
Sorry for being a day late! I wanted to finish up one of the new features which caused this small delay. ✨

🔖 You can read my other development diaries here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NorthCrab/diary/

🐙 My work is available publicly on this GitHub repository:
https://github.com/Zaczero/openstreetmap-ng

GitHub stars counter

Let’s summarize the last week’s work:

Client-side Trace Images

While migrating the traces functionality, I came up with an amazing and seemingly obvious idea. Why not make trace images SVGs and render them client-sided? This feature has few significant advantages: even faster trace uploading, no additional disk usage, unlimited customization, infinite resolution, faster page loading. And so here it is:

Comparison screenshot of the new client-side generated trace images (SVGs)

The application can freely adjust the quality of generated images. The code can also be reused for implementing proper trace-on-map rendering, which is one of the new upcoming features.

SVG supports animations too!

Animated trace using SVG

Refreshed Traces UI

Screenshot showcasing refreshed public traces UI

» Open in full screen

Last week I have also worked on refreshing the traces UI, focusing on making it more open and friendly. If you have been following my previous diaries, you may recognize some of the new style language.

Deployment Scripts

I also wrote and successfully tested server-deployment scripts for the application. They are currently a part of the openaedmap-backend project but will soon be copied over to the openstreetmap-ng. Both projects share many similarities in how they are run.

Final Words

Previous development diary #3 was packed with lots of new stuff. I took this week a little slower to catch a breath. Meantime, I contributed to other projects (openaedmap, starlette) and also helped OSM-PL with server migration process. I was also away for a short time for some BBQ🌞!

Project Sponsors 🏅

Thank you to this week’s project patrons! I truly appreciate your every contribution!

Currently, the project is sponsored by 11 people!
Five private and three public donors on Liberapay, and three public on GitHub Sponsors.

If you can, please consider supporting the NG development. Any amount helps me focus on making high-quality free software for everyone to enjoy! (shh… next week I will announce a new supporter benefit) 😋

Donate using Liberapay

Disclaimer

This project is not affiliated with the OpenStreetMap Foundation.

Posted by Eden Oluigbo on 8 April 2024 in English.

Not A Goodbye!

Two friends waving at each other

This is the Closing Chapter! However, the story continues😀

My friend (and colleague) Ola messaged me and asked, “Eden, how do you feel, that your internship at HOTOSM is ending soon?” I took a long pause to answer that 🥹.

As the curtains draw close on this chapter of my professional journey, I find myself reflecting on colourful experiences, lessons, and memories that have defined my time as an intern at HOTOSM.

It’s been 3 months already!?🥹 Like someone rightly said “time goes by quickly, when you are having fun”. I’m usually the type of person that looks forward to the end of a thing because I learnt to always finish what I started. But this time, it felt weird! A mix of nostalgia and anticipation.

I love it at HOT and I will forever cherish my time here; where every encounter was a lesson and every challenge a stepping stone. The vision, the community, the staff, the enriching days of inspiring coffee chats, talks with my favourite colleague, the opportunities, the work I did, and my wonderful mentor, Petya Kangalova.

Throughout these past 3 months, I’ve been privileged to be guided by the most amazing mentor ever, Petya Kangalova, who generously shared wisdom, resources, expertise, and opportunities for me to grow. Each day presented a fresh “GO!” for me to experiment, iterate and grow. From navigating the complexities of projects to engaging in insightful conversations on Mondays (and other days). Every moment has contributed to my development as a professional and my confidence as an individual.

What’s next?

I’m proud of myself for the work I did, and the initiatives I took in an attempt to maximise my time with HOT. I got really sweet feedback that will forever keep me motivated. And the story continues, it doesn’t end now. Not anytime soon. I am thankful for the opportunity to be a co-mentor for the next round of Outreachy internship at HOTOSM.

Part of what’s next for me is to continue contributing to HOT’s open source project, with a special interest in HOT’s fAIr software. fAIr is an open AI-assisted mapping service software, that aims to improve the efficiency and accuracy of mapping efforts for humanitarian purposes.

If you’re a beginner to open source and don’t know where to start, but excited to do so, I recommend joining the HOT Tech and Innovation Working Group to learn and grow your skill, within an inclusive community. And If you want to get your hands busy right away, check for “good first issues” or “beginner friendly issues” at the HOT Github page.

You can also watch this comprehensive video guide on how to contribute to HOTOSM open source projects on Github. Listen to our active contributors share their experience contributing to HOT’s open source project.

C’est fini – but it is also a new beginning. With a heart of gratitude and determination, I step forward, eager to embrace the next challenge, and open to the endless possibilities that await beyond the threshold of familiarity.

Special thank you to my mentor, Petya Kangalova. Thank you HOTOSM, Outreachy internship – you have been more than a chapter; you have been a transformational point in my professional journey, guiding me towards the horizon of endless possibilities.

If this is your first time reading my diary, please catch up with my previous blogs here or connect with me and reach out via X @edenxcodes to stay updated on my next steps.

Till next time,
Eden.

The situations described in this article are limited to Mainland China. The administrative divisions in Mainland China are very complex, and even for natives, it is difficult to understand them all at once. Therefore, please make sure you have a thorough understanding of the administrative divisions in Mainland China before editing relevant content.
参考:OSM Wiki China/Boundaries & Zh-hans:中华人民共和国#中国行政区划

(本文有若干内容是在发表后逐渐加入,若发现错漏或有任何疑问,恳请评论或发站内信指出)

本文旨在厘清中国大陆高度复杂的行政区划体系,并为希望完善相关数据的 OSM 贡献者们提供指引。本文所述内容及标注规范仅限于中国大陆地区(港澳台地区的情况请咨询相应社区),包含:

  • 法定行政区;
  • 非法定行政区;及
  • 标签的值与位置。

1 法定行政区

《中华人民共和国宪法》中有如下规定:

第三十条 中华人民共和国的行政区域划分如下:
(一)全国分为省、自治区、直辖市;
(二)省、自治区分为自治州、县、自治县、市;
(三)县、自治县分为乡、民族乡、镇。
直辖市和较大的市分为区、县。自治州分为县、自治县、市。
自治区、自治州、自治县都是民族自治地方。

1.1 含义

理论上来说,中国大陆的行政区划体系应该与如上规定一致。然而,几乎任何在中国大陆生活过的人都会立刻发现,这其中缺少了一个非常重要的概念:地级市。实际上,在法律法规资料库中,你几乎不可能找到「地级市」这个概念,在不得不提及时也会使用「设区市」或近义词。这是因为在实务中,地级市可能还管辖着县级市,而市不能下辖市,因此绝大多数县级市的名义都是「xx省直辖,xx市代管」(注1),不过通常可以将其视为仅由地级市管辖(但独立性相比县为强)。
此外,特区和林区(各自均仅有一例)作为历史遗留,也被承认为正式的县级行政区;部分民族自治区域也未写入法条。
因此,中国大陆的法定行政区如下表所示(注2):

行政区等级 行政区类型
省级 省、自治区、直辖市
地级 地级市、地区、盟、自治州
县级 县、自治县、县级市、旗、自治旗、市辖区、特区、林区
乡级 乡、民族乡、苏木、民族苏木、镇、街道
村级 (行政)村、牧委会、嘎查、社区

注1:部分县或县级市为「省直辖县级行政单位」,其不受地级单位管辖,行政区划代码第 3、4 位为特殊的 90,如湖北省仙桃市、河南省济源市、海南省临高县等。「省直辖县级行政单位」与「直筒子市」的区别在于名义上前者缺少地市一级,后者缺少区县一级

注2:根据《中华人民共和国民族区域自治法》第二条、第十二条,民族区()、民族镇()并非民族自治地方,目前一般将后两者视同普通区和镇。

1.2 标注等级

在关系 (relation) 中使用 admin_level,而在节点 (node) 上使用 capital。比如,一个县的关系中应有 admin_level=6,而该县的节点(place=city)上应有 capital=6。以下是各级行政区的标注等级:

行政区等级 admin_level/capital
省、自治区、直辖市 4
地级市、地区、盟、自治州 5
县、自治县、县级市、旗、自治旗、市辖区、特区、林区 6
乡、民族乡、苏木、民族苏木、镇、街道 8
(行政)村、牧委会、嘎查、社区 10

2 非法定行政区(「黑区」)

看起来,这套行政区划体系似乎非常清晰。然而理想是美好的,实际上,以下情况都存在:

  • 每一级行政区都存在实际管辖范围与其法定管辖范围不同的情况;

  • 某些行政区并不归其法定的上级管辖,而是由(通常是更上一级的)一个派出机构——通常是管委会——管辖,这些管委会的职能无限接近于一级政府,然而民政部并不承认它们是正式区划;

  • 上一条所述的管委会与一个法定行政区合署办公(一个机构两块牌子,实际上是管委会取代了地方政府),但管委会的管辖范围大于挂名的法定行政区。

举例来说,上面三种情况分别有:

如果你居住在中国大陆,感受可能会更加明显:你有可能就生活在这种名义上属于法定区县,但实际上由管委会管辖的地方;这些非法定的行政管理区就是俗称的「黑区」。

2.1 含义

通常来说,如果一个地方由省、地、县级政府的派出机构管辖经济社会事务,该处就可以被称作一个「黑区」(包括但不限于国家级新区、经济技术开发区、高新技术产业开发区等未在民政部行政区划统计表中的行政区划)。为了便于管理,「黑区」的边界通常都由法定行政区的边界组成(但可能是镇街甚至村社的边界)。
「黑区」既可能管辖县、镇、街道、村,也可能自行设立与法定行政区不完全重合的下级管理区。对于前一种情况可以根据下表进行分类,后者则可以参考管委会行政级别确定。

「黑区」等级 下辖
准地级
准县级 镇、街道、乡等
准乡级 村、社区等

注意:由于 OSM 遵循「de facto」即实控原则,某些情况下黑区的存在会改变法定行政区的边界范围,使其与官方或商业地图不一致(有些标注模式甚至仅在 OSM 出现),如:

这些都属于正常现象,因此在发现县级边界与其它地图不同时请不要贸然修改,应在查证实际管理情况后再做操作。(需要指出的是,只有在法定行政区托管或实控其它区域的情况下法定行政区界才会变动,否则相应区域通常用 admin_level=7 的「黑区」加盖)

2.2 标注等级

与法定行政区一样,「黑区」的关系中仍然使用 admin_level,但并非所有的「黑区」都要有节点(主要取决于名称是否被当作地名使用或者管委会驻地是否位于独立于法定行政区的聚落,如类似「xx经济技术开发区」的单纯性质名称就不应有节点,另见注2)。

根据下辖区划的不同,笔者粗略地将黑区的标注分类如下:

「黑区」等级 下辖 admin_level/capital 举例
准地级 5 当前仅有雄安新区
准县级 镇、街道等 6 注1
准县级 镇、街道等 7 (注3) 安徽省芜湖市芜湖经济开发区(340271)
准乡级 村、社区等 8/9 (注4) 江西省南昌市南昌县小蓝经济开发区(360121403)

注1:当前仅包含加格达奇区、松岭区、新林区、呼中区、苏州工业园区深汕特别合作区大柴旦行政委员会

注2:仅下辖虚拟社区/生活区的「黑区」仅应有边界(若存在)关系而不应有label,如天津市宝坻区京津中关村科技城(120115457)下仅有虚拟社区(120115457498)

注3:在中国大陆,admin_level=7 不能单独存在,其范围必然与一个或数个法定行政区的范围重叠

注4:统计局口径下管辖村社的准乡级「黑区」可能难以找到属于哪一法定乡镇的管辖范围,同时它们还可能自行设立分管若干村社的管理区。因此该级别「黑区」的标注方式还未完全确定,在前者情况下可酌情使用 admin_level/capital=8

3 标签

3.1 标签的值

3.1.1 区域型标签

目前在中国大陆地区,place=state/region/county/district 一般用于区域型政区的替代渲染(大多是第三方服务,如 OsmAnd),比如 OSM Carto(也就是 OSM 网站的默认渲染)中看到的「xx省」字样就是由这类标签渲染出来的(而黑色字的「xx市」则由 place=city 渲染)。

具体而言,place=state 代表省级行政区(),place=region 代表地级行政区(),place=county/district 代表县级行政区()。

当前,对县级行政区的标注不统一且没有公认的规范(如,有些市辖区似乎没必要渲染区域型名字,同时 placecounty/district 仍存在争议)。

3.1.2 通常的行政区标签

等级 capital place (注1) 举例
省级行政中心 4 city 呼和浩特市
地级行政中心 5 city 黑河市
县级行政中心 6 city 大同区
乡镇驻地 8 town/suburb (注2) 松花江镇
村社驻地 10 village/quarter (注2) 小张各庄村

注1:大部分行政区节点标签应同时有 place:CN 标注

注2:属于城市建成区一部分的街道和社区分别使用 place=suburb/quarter,但非位于更大聚落的或乡镇改制的街道,以及除街道和社区以外的任何乡镇级区划,仍一律标注 place=town/village

3.1.3 「黑区」的标签

(参照 §2.2 标注等级)

「黑区」等级 capital place 举例
准地级 5 city 当前仅有雄安新区
准县级 6 city 注3
准县级 7 city/town (注4) 兰州新区
准乡级 8/9 town  

注3:当前仅包含加格达奇区、松岭区、新林区、呼中区、苏州工业园区深汕特别合作区大柴旦行政委员会

注4:有必要标注节点的准县级「黑区」使用 place=city/town 存在争议

3.2 标签的位置

本节只讨论 place=city/town/village 等定居点的标签,不含区域型标签如 place=region/county

中国大陆的商业地图通常将行政区名所在的节点标注在政府(或村委会等)所在地,然而这经常会导致该节点不具有指向作用,因为相当数量的市、区、县政府都并不位于城镇中心甚至城镇内(比如,仅辽宁一省就有沈阳、本溪、铁岭、丹东、盘锦五个地级市政府的位置不在主城区)。此外,由于许多镇被改制为街道或撤并入其它乡镇,表示它们的节点也消失在商业地图上。

因此,对于有标签的行政区,建议其标签位置遵循如下原则:

  • 市辖区以外的县级行政区:公众认知的城镇中心标志物(如成都天府广场、长春人民广场、西安钟楼等)或建成区的大致中心位置(没有前者时);

  • 市辖区:(若由县或县级市等改制而来则参照前一条)若该区域没有明显的中心,可放在区政府处,也可在区名所在的地标处(需要在区内,如武汉市洪山区就只能放在区政府处)。特别地,如果区政府在建成区外,节点就不可放在区政府处而只能移动到建成区内;

  • 街道以外的乡级行政区:若乡镇政府在所驻集镇建成区则标在该处,否则参照第一条(后者情况较少,如滁州市来安县水口镇);

  • 街道:(若从乡镇等改制而来则参照前一条)标注在街道办事处处(若其在辖区外则不标注节点),然而当前是否标注城区析置街道存在争议;

  • 村级行政区:村部(或社区居委会等)处(当前对村级行政区的标注争议较大)。

特别地,抚顺县(辽宁省抚顺市)和沧县(河北省沧州市)没有县城,政府驻地位于其它区,因此没有 place=city 节点。此外,某些行政区的政府驻地在辖区外但有自己的城区,如安次区(河北省廊坊市),参照前文所述标注即可。

Posted by GovernorKeagan on 7 April 2024 in English.

Overview

Progress has been solid over the past week. My main focus is still trying to add in as many missing buildings as possible, but I’ve covered the following during the week:

  • Micromapping. While fixing two schools and two shopping centres, I decided to micromap them using a combination of aerial imagery and my local knowledge.

  • More buildings. I’m still just trying to “fill in the blanks” and get buildings added.

  • Small fixes. While doing other mapping, I came across various small issues that I fixed at the same time.

Micromapping

Schools

While updating some details for Victoria Park High School & Victoria Park Primary School, I decided to micromap them while fixing some misalignments. I tried to map in a way that makes sense and not just to make it look pretty on the renderer.

While doing this, I noticed that the park next to the High School had some seemingly strange boundaries. I need to do some more research to confirm where the park boundaries lie, so for now it remains the same.

Shopping Centres

Similar to how I started with the schools, I wanted to correct some details and fix some “wonky” mapping from older imagery. I ended up doing some pretty detailed micromapping except for changing some shop details - I know that they aren’t there any more, but I don’t have the current shop details at the moment.

More Buildings

I’m very happy with the progress that I’ve made. It’s slow at times, but it is moving and I can see the difference. There has been a decent amount of properties that had a node with address but no area mapped for the building. This has come in handy once or twice where I could verify the building to ensure that it is still there, which wasn’t always the case.

Having said that, it would still be great for a local to confirm all of this, there’s only so much I can do from Ireland.

Small Fixes

While doing other mapping tasks, I have tried to correct any other issues at the same time. Generally, this has been correcting some wonky alignment of roads. It’s easier to fix these things at the moment then trying to go back and fix a larger issue.

General Observations

Just a couple of things I’ve noticed while working on this project.

  1. I mentioned this already, but I’ve come across a good number of buildings that have only had an address node over the building (without any area mapped).

  2. I noticed that someone had micromapped some residential properties. While I’m all for micromapping (I did a decent amount this week), adding trees to someone’s back garden seems a little strange.

  3. The satellite imagery is really good! I would love it if Ireland had the same high quality imagery.

  4. There is next to no landuse=residential or landuse=retail mapping. While I’m 90% sure of what is a business and what is a residential property, a lot has changed in the almost 6 years since I was last in South Africa. I’ve added a little, but for the most part I’ll leave it for a local.


Before:

Start of the week before I started mapping.

After:

Progress as of the 7th of April (1 week of mapping)

Before: Victoria Park High School

The main buildings were mapped already, but they lacked detail.

After: Victoria Park High School

Details added, as well as some micromapping.

Before: Victoria Park Primary School

Similar story to the above.

After: Victoria Park Primary School

Details added, as well as some micromapping.

Location: Nelson Mandela Bay Ward 3, Gqeberha, Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa

IVIDES.org® realizou oficina sobre POI


O Instituto Virtual para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável promoveu uma oficina sobre mapeamento colaborativo de pontos de interesse (POI) com OpenStreetMap.

O conteúdo abrangeu os pontos de interesse mais utilizados e um diferencial, o mapeamento dos pontos costeiros e marinhos, que são frequentemente negligenciados nas palestras e cursos sobre o assunto.

Todos os arquivos da apresentação podem ser encontrados no portal do treinamento, que inclui também a agenda dos demais encontros.

https://ivides.org/oficinas-mapeamento-openstreetmap

https://ivides.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/capa_video.png

A gravação da sessão pode ser encontrada no canal do IVIDES.org® no YouTube.

https://ivides.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/capa_video2-1.png

DOWNLOAD DOS ARQUIVOS DA OFICINA – Arquivo da apresentação e arquivos extras.

https://ivides.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/fig2.png

https://ivides.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/fig.png

IVIDES_logo

youthmappers-ufrj

Posted by PineappleSkip on 6 April 2024 in English. Last updated on 11 April 2024.

Guidance missing for Queensland

There is no clear indication on the Australian Tagging Guidelines/Roads about how Queensland Roads should be classified according to a national hierarchy.

This diary note is about rural roads. I live in a smallish country town and there are few urban roads that aren’t covered by the rural roads hierarchy

Classification and tagging in Australia

The primary guidance appears to be the comprehensive Victorian classification, which classified roads as M, A, B, C or D, or unclassified, with M, A, B and C routes signed. These are to be tagged as Motorway, Trunk, Primary, Secondary and Tertiary.

Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia sign C roads (with the exception of a handful of South Australian Roads) and the extent of the classifications varies by State or Territory. NSW only signs A and B roads.

NSW classification and tagging.

NSW is significant to Queensland classification as the primary traffic interface to Queensland is NSW. Traffic into South Australia and the Northern Terrirory is negligible by comparison.

NSW readily corresponds to Victoria at the top levels with M, A and B roads as corresponding to the Victorian Hierarchy.

The NSW Roads Act 1993 specifies an elaborate classification, but tagging is based on simplified NSW Main Road classifications at the B and below level. The two categories are State Roads and Regional Roads. 1. State Roads, which are largely A and B roads but include some others (e.g. Byrock to Brewarrina, Tumut to Tumbarumba) which are unnumbered. (as noted above M and A roads are tagged as higher in the hierarchy). 2. Regional Roads, which appear to be the balance of NSW Main Roads.

For Openstreetmap, NSW State Roads, whether signed as B or not, are tagged as primary roads. Regional Roads are tagged as secondary roads. There is a clear source for contributors in this Official Map of classified roads

Suggested Queensland classification

There is a useful discussion of the classification system in Queensland in the Ozroads website which provides background. The names applied to important roads generally reflect an old classification which named State Highways and Developmental Roads, the latter being roads in remote areas which were originally constructed to a lesser standard to State Highways but have since been progressively improved.

Queensland only gives letter designations to roads classified as M (motorway) and A (primary) roads, with a broadbrush categorisation resulting in a couple of B NSW roads crossing the border and becoming A Queensland Roads (B71/A71 at Barringun, B55/A55 at Hebel). These roads would readily map to the Motorway and Trunk OSM classifications, and review of some examples indicates that’s done fairly consistently.

Most Queensland roads have not been signed using the M, A, B categorisation, and National Routes and State Routes are badged to many roads. However the existence of signage on the ground, particularly for those that aren’t M roads or A roads, is haphazard and often non existent, meaning route signage is often available for ground-truthing classifications and tagging the classification of roads.

There is a further numbering system which is administratively used by TMR that

Like NSW, Queensland has a “State Road Network of Queensland Map” maintained by its Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) showing a categorisation of significant roads available online. This would provide a ready means for contributors to identify the classification of roads.

TMR has a hierarchy of four categories of rural roads in Queensland according to this classification, all of which are higher in the hierarchy than roads that are not. There is a fifth category which overlaps the fourth.

  1. National Road Network, Tag as Motorway or Trunk as appropriate. All of these roads are A or M classified roads. All are sealed. There are also a few franchised roads around Brisbane, which are tollways built under build own operate type arrangements and also signed as M roads.

  2. State Strategic Road Network. Tag as Trunk. These roads are all named as highways, with one exception, which is a developmental road. The bulk of these, but not all, have been given A route designations. All are sealed. There is consistency with the guidelines as applied to other states in tagging these highways as trunk and they appear to be so tagged.

  3. Regional Road Network. Tag as Primary. These roads include the balance of the State Highway network and the most important main roads. Thgey are largely sealed, although there are many sections in outback areas that are unsealed. There appears to be some correlation with the roads classified as State Roads in NSW, for which the tagging guidelines specify tagging as Primary.

  4. District Road Network. Tag as Secondary. This is the balance of the TMR owned roads and all correspond to either main roads or secondary roads in the old TMR classification. They are comonly known as main roads as they are owned* by TMR rather than local authorities.

  5. Local Roads of Regional Significance (LRRS). Tag as Tertiary, together with other roads os similar significance. These are also shown on the map and are a combination of District Roads (owned by TMR) and other roads (owned by local councils). They are described by TMR as State roads and council roads that have a similar function. There are a roughly equivalent number of LRRS which are state roads and local roads. It would be logical to tag local roads of regional significance which aren’t in category four as tertiary roads, however this is likely to be an incomplete guide to tertiary roads. This is because LRRS status is applied for by councils and a section of a connecting road in one council may have been designated as a LRRS but not in an adjacent council.

*The Roads described are are all public roads owned by Government, but I have used the term owned in this note to refer to the maintenance responsibility. For the four categories of TMR roads, TMR funds maintenance, and for most other roads maintainance if funded by local councils.

Footnote

I also discovered that there is a dataset maintained by Department of Resources with a data dictionary. This could be a more complete guide than the TMR, but I haven’t researched this much (yet).

感謝 TomTom 台灣辦公室 ê 牽成,由𪜶公司成大測量系系友去接接,閣加上 OpenStreetMap Taiwan ū 申請社群的 Tasking Manager 管理權限,會當新增適合本地進行 ê 專案,才有這改 ê 機會去成大進行 OpenStreetMap 圖客工作坊,並且用 Tasking Manager 來分配繪製台灣本地 ê 圖資。

Tasking Manager ▲ Tasking Manager ê 專案,這改 boeh 繪製 ê 範圍-台南學甲區

這改成大圖客松 3/26 為止攏總 ū 107 个編輯變動,29 个 sī 工作人員 ê 編輯變動,3 个社群朋友 ê 編輯變動,22 位學生投入編輯總共 ū 75 个編輯變動,設定繪製 ê 目標建築,總共畫出 369 棟。

學生家己動手了後,投入 ê 狀況猶袂䆀,頭起先紹介𪜶 OpenStreetMap ê 基礎智識,閣來予𪜶知影資料 boeh 按怎產生–ê,落尾家己動手來做。毋過整體時間干焦一个半點鐘,其實時間無夠用,除非抵著比較庄腳 ê 任務,正常來講可能一塊當中 ê 建築攏畫袂完。

這改邀請方 sī 成大測量系,佮老師話仙時,𪜶定定 teh 運用 OpenStreetMap 資料,老師和社群部分 sī 熟似早年 ê OpenStreetMap 台灣社群走跳 ê Dongpo,因此 OpenStreetMap 相關 ê 智識 sī tuì Dongpo 來–ê,嘛是真合理 ê 代誌,因為 Dongpo 嘛是空間資訊學科背景 ê 人。

台南成大 ▲ 台南成大 tī OpenStreetMap 頂懸畫甲真詳細

進前已經由社群資深成員 kā 傷大 ê 土地利用拆解處理,這是進前台南土地利用 ê 歷史遺留問題。社群朋友建議會當教關掉特定圖徵。我 ê 回應 sī 若是 boeh 畫台南市東區抑是中南區 ē 關掉,毋過學甲 ê 資料量應該 sī bô chōe,boeh 畫 ê時愛 kā 畫面變大,應該袂無細膩 kā 地址點位合併掉–ah。

進前討論工作坊 ài 做啥物 ê 時,有想著用 MapRoulette ê 任務,毋過解微型任務傷技術 kah 資料導向–ah,學生可能袂明白佇咧創啥,閣來 sī MapRoulette 網站傷無穩定–ah,頂擺 OSMF Board meeting Martijn van Exel 還有上去報告,拍算請求 OSMF 資源協助。到時陣若是真正用 MapRoulette 有可能拄著網站掛–ah。

紲落來任務 ê 拍算,抑是 boeh 聽候台灣社群 ê 逐家有閒 sî 來畫畫,因為工作坊參與者閣來編輯 ê 比率無懸。學生 ū 傷濟好耍 ê 代誌會當做。目前 tī OpenStreetMap Taiwan 內 ū 四个畫地圖專案,閣看覓情況多開 HOT Tasking Manager 專案來處理台灣特定地方 ê 資料,敬請期待。

Location: 大學里, 東區, 臺南市, 701, 臺灣
Posted by Cyberjuan on 5 April 2024 in English. Last updated on 10 April 2024.

 It is with great excitement that we present to you the Organizing Committee of the SotM LATAM 2024 which will take place in Belem, Brazil, from December 6 to 8 of this year.

This volunteer committee has, among others, the functions that the SotM Working Group assumes in the global SotM, that is, mainly:

  • seeking a host location,
  • arranging sponsorship,
  • organising the detail of the conference,
  • promoting the conference, and
  • running the conference.

This committee is made up of those who, at the last AbreLatam 2023 in Montevideo, Uruguay, had the initial idea of holding the SotM Latam together with the FOSS4G 2024 that was announced at said event. Other map enthusiasts have been joining this initial group, contributing different visions and perspectives that we are sure will enrich SOTM LATAM 2024.

Member Representation Position Role
Raphael de Assis UMBRAOSM President Local committee
Roberto de Andrade UMBRAOSM Secretary Local committee
Vitor George Brazil Community Member IT
Anderson Toniazo Brazil Community Member Academic committee
Rodrigo Smarzaro Youthmappers UFV Member Local committee
Tatiana Pará OsGeo Brasil Member FOSS4G, Local committee
Selene Yang Geochicas Member Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
Juan Ángel Barajas Youthmappers LATAM Member Programming committee
Juan Arellano OSM LATAM Member Comunication

We will soon be announcing the formation of the other work committees: Local committee, IT/Communications committee, Programming committee and Academic committee.

Location: Mario Rivera, Yavari, Province of Mariscal Ramón Castilla, Loreto, Peru

Presentation of the Organizing Committee of SOTM LATAM 2024 in Brazil. Amazônia, Belém - Pará Brazil

It is with great excitement that we introduce you to the Organization Committee of SotM LATAM 2024 that will take place in Belén, Brazil, from December 6 to 8 of this year.

It is with great excitement that we introduce you to the Organization Committee of SotM LATAM 2024 that will take place in Belén, Brazil, from December 6 to 8 of this year.

This volunteer committee has, among others, the functions that the SotM Working Group assumes in the global SotM, that is, mainly:

Determine the location of the event, Coordinate sponsorships, Approve the event schedule, Promote the event Direct the event. This committee is made up of those who, at the last AbreLatam 2023 in Montevideo, Uruguay, had the initial idea of ​​holding the SotM Latam together with the FOSS4G 2024 that was announced at said event. Other enthusiasts have been joining this initial group, contributing different visions and perspectives that we are sure will enrich SOTM LATAM 2024.

Member Representation Position Function

Raphael de Assis UMBRAOSM President Local Committee

Roberto de Andrade UMBRAOSM Secretary Local Committee

Vitor George Community Brazil Member IT

Anderson Toniazo Community Brazil Member Academic Committee

Rodrigo Smarzaro Youthmappers UFV Member Local Committee

Tatiana Pará OsGeo Brazil FOSS4G Member, Local Committee

Selene Yang Geochicas Member Diversity, Equity, Inclusion

Juan Ángel Barajas Youthmappers LATAM Programming Committee Member

Juan Arellano OSM Peru Member Communication

We will soon be announcing the formation of the other work committees: Local Committee, IT/Communications Committee, Programming Committee and Academic Committee.

Organizing Committee of SotM Latam 2024 Belém - Pará - Brazil https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:LatAm/Eventos/State_of_the_Map_Latam_2024 https://2024.osmlatam.org/

Contact: state@osmlatam.org

Location: Marco, Belém, Região Geográfica Imediata de Belém, Região Geográfica Intermediária de Belém, Pará, North Region, Brazil