This changeset created a town-sized building. I've gone ahead and reverted it, but did you create any other giant buildings in the area?

Hello,

you've created a giant building with a gibberish name in this changeset. OpenStreetMap is a project used by many, not a sandbox for personal edits. I'm going to go ahead and revert this edit.

Hello, you've removed more specific information from the website in favour of the generic page for the chain. This is generally not a good idea.

If this is a bot edit, can you point to the bot documentation on the OSM wiki and consultation with the local community?

This has resulted in quite a bit of a mess around osm.org/relation/8453407#map=17/49.84135/-121.43069 and I'm wondering how it's best to fix it.

I've reverted this because they've not yet renamed the park as of last Monday.

I drove by here, and these aren't living streets. Living streets seldom exist in Canada and I'm not aware of any in BC.

Hello,
I've tried to contact the organiser of this organised edit at osm.maps.ext@swiggy.in, but the email bounces. Part of the organised edit guidelines is being able to contact someone about them, what should I use for contact information?

When I drove by on the 5th, the road was still named Colony Farm Road

It also mentions Tagging these as highway=living_street has been controversial because pedestrian-safe speed limits are not part of the initiative. The roads I looked at had speed limits of 20 mph or above, far above walking speed.

Hi,
you changed some ways like osm.org/way/357558737 to be tagged as a highway=living_street.

highway=living_street as a concept does not normally exist in the US or Canada. They're closer to a highway=pedestrian that allows cars to move alongside pedestrians than a residential or service road.

I had a look at the bing street-side imagery here and although a sign mentions children, it's not a pedestrian priority area.

I've fixed up the tagging here

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

In this changeset you deleted the service tag, but I wanted to point out that the highway=living_street tag is incorrect, and a better change might have been to fix that and leave the service tag as-is

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

This left the turn restrictions broken with only two members. I fixed them up in osm.org/changeset/135799616, but should survey to see if you can cross 13th headed southbound on a car.

Why did you remove the name:en tag here, but not any of the adjacent roads? What makes you think the name:en tag was wrong?

It looks like you did select all in JOSM and applied a tag. Can you link to the mechanical edit discussion where you described what you were doing, so we can see where it went wrong?

I've restored the driveway and added access tagging. There's lots of driveways mapped in OSM

We map all roads with OSM, if they're open to the public or not. Access can be indicated with access tags.