I wrote this script because someone on it OSM TG channel told that a certain QA tool was dismissed. But no one remembered its name…

About the 403, my mistake… I should keep 500-503. Besides someone just suggested me to add a Mozilla family useragent (-A in curl command) to avoid false positives.

Grazie Ivan! E a watmildon per l’integrazione. La metterò al top segnalibri.

Please, find my considerations and tests at osm.org/user/Cascafico/diary/399590

Just posted in import ML.

I agree. Take a look at Mullaloo suburb.

Nice post :-)

about buildings, did you evaluate Microsoft global building footprints ODbL release? I tested some cases in Europe, but high building density means a hard manual work to prepare data for import. I think Australia could be an easier case.

Thanks Frederik: I was looking for a tool which allows thematic surveys and you gave me the Vespucci hint. And, of course, trees survey is in my TODO list.

Input is similar to Qfield, which I recently tested in extra OSM projects. In my opinion, tranferring surveys in OSM is much quicker if ERSI formats and QGIS are not involved.

Nice idea to link osmcha rss to telegram., but from my point of view, there’s a problem which may impact effectiveness. Osmcha, like Opentreetmap history page, matches every changeset with large bbox, making almost impossible to filter them out… for instance wheelmap_visitor edits.

As far as I understand, the trick is done in post_labels… anyway, it seems there is a github feature request

Ooops! I should have better red OSMAT docs… where can I select which OMS elements to monitor?

Esiste una repository di vari dataset, oltre alle piste ciclabili, per il Comune di Milano?

Certo! Qui l’Elenco completo dove puoi filtrare i date geografici, presumo quelli nei formati geojson e shp

If you take a look at the scope of said Automated Edits code of conduct, you’ll notice that your blog post exactly matches point 4 in the scope section

Yes, after your hint I red the whole article; what I ment is that title “Automated edits code of conduct” was misleading. I had a different idea of “automated”.

Thanks for this info! Actually I didn’t think my mass edits falled in “automated” category mentioned by the code of conduct you quoted.

I hope somebody will document the precious overpass.turbo syntax that “overpass” :-) mixed value notations.

Thanks a lot! I will read carefully those queries (I didn’t know there were a blog about overpass-turbo).

Ciao. Few days around with it and I think that Geopaparazzi worths a try https://code.google.com/p/geopaparazzi/ I’m getting OSMtracker to compare. Thanks!